nanog mailing list archives
Re: wifi blocking [was Re: Marriott wifi blocking]
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2014 00:03:02 -0700
On Oct 8, 2014, at 2:11 PM, William Herrin <bill () herrin us> wrote:
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 4:37 PM, joel jaeggli <joelja () bogus com> wrote:On 10/8/14 1:29 PM, Larry Sheldon wrote:On 10/8/2014 08:47, William Herrin wrote:BART would not have had an FCC license. They'd have had contracts with the various phone companies to co-locate equipment and provide wired backhaul out of the tunnels. The only thing they'd be guilty of is breach of contract, and that only if the cell phone companies decided their behavior was inconsistent with the SLA..OK that makes more sense than the private answer I got from Roy. I wondered why the FCC didn't take action if there was a license violation.http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/03/technology/fcc-reviews-need-for-rules-to-interrupt-wireless-service.html?_r=0From the article: "Among the issues on which the F.C.C. is seekingcomment is whether it even has authority over the issue." Also: "The BART system owns the wireless transmitters and receivers that allow for cellphone reception within its network.”
I’m not sure that statement is accurate. However, there is no prohibition against owning a Microcell or other cellular station which is operated by a third party under said third party’s license.
I'm not entirely clear how that works.
If that were truly the case (and I don’t think it is, given BART statements that “...the cellular providers are basically tenants and are as such subject to…”), I’m pretty sure it would be operated by the cellular carrier under their license as a non-owner of the equipment. Owen
Current thread:
- Re: wifi blocking [was Re: Marriott wifi blocking], (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: wifi blocking [was Re: Marriott wifi blocking] Larry Sheldon (Oct 07)
- Re: wifi blocking [was Re: Marriott wifi blocking] Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 07)
- Message not available
- Re: wifi blocking [was Re: Marriott wifi blocking] Larry Sheldon (Oct 07)
- Re: wifi blocking [was Re: Marriott wifi blocking] Roy (Oct 08)
- Re: wifi blocking [was Re: Marriott wifi blocking] William Herrin (Oct 08)
- Message not available
- Re: wifi blocking [was Re: Marriott wifi blocking] Larry Sheldon (Oct 08)
- Re: wifi blocking [was Re: Marriott wifi blocking] joel jaeggli (Oct 08)
- Re: wifi blocking [was Re: Marriott wifi blocking] William Herrin (Oct 08)
- Re: wifi blocking [was Re: Marriott wifi blocking] Keenan Tims (Oct 08)
- Message not available
- Re: wifi blocking [was Re: Marriott wifi blocking] Larry Sheldon (Oct 08)
- Re: wifi blocking [was Re: Marriott wifi blocking] Owen DeLong (Oct 09)
- Message not available
- Re: wifi blocking [was Re: Marriott wifi blocking] Larry Sheldon (Oct 09)
- Re: wifi blocking [was Re: Marriott wifi blocking] Owen DeLong (Oct 09)
- Message not available
- Re: wifi blocking [was Re: Marriott wifi blocking] Larry Sheldon (Oct 09)
- Re: wifi blocking [was Re: Marriott wifi blocking] Owen DeLong (Oct 09)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: wifi blocking [was Re: Marriott wifi blocking] Larry Sheldon (Oct 09)
- Message not available
- Re: wifi blocking [was Re: Marriott wifi blocking] Larry Sheldon (Oct 08)
- Re: wifi blocking [was Re: Marriott wifi blocking] Owen DeLong (Oct 09)
- Message not available
- Re: wifi blocking [was Re: Marriott wifi blocking] Larry Sheldon (Oct 09)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: wifi blocking [was Re: Marriott wifi blocking] Larry Sheldon (Oct 07)
- Re: wifi blocking [was Re: Marriott wifi blocking] Matt Palmer (Oct 07)