nanog mailing list archives
Re: .sj/.bv == privacy?
From: Dave Crocker <dhc2 () dcrocker net>
Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 09:08:19 -0700
for the purpose of a specialty domain registry where registrants (such as hosting companies) would be contractually required to guarantee privacy to their end customers.
Hmmm... Until privacy is a feature across many/most hosting services, anyone specializing it is, in effect, identifying traffic that is likely to be /more/ interesting for those wishing to inspect the data. In other words, anything that explicitly identifies traffic as attempting greater privacy is likely to be a greater target for attack. d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net
Current thread:
- .sj/.bv == privacy? Jay Ashworth (Oct 01)
- Re: .sj/.bv == privacy? Mehmet Akcin (Oct 01)
- Re: .sj/.bv == privacy? Dave Crocker (Oct 01)
- Re: .sj/.bv == privacy? Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 01)