nanog mailing list archives
Re: TWC IPv6 access ...
From: David Coulson <david () davidcoulson net>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 07:29:59 -0500
Which market are you in? Working for me in Cleveland, OH. fw-1:/root # ping6 -I eth7 fe80::201:5cff:fe66:fe46PING fe80::201:5cff:fe66:fe46(fe80::201:5cff:fe66:fe46) from fe80::21a:8cff:fe17:6c47 eth7: 56 data bytes
64 bytes from fe80::201:5cff:fe66:fe46: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=19.2 ms 64 bytes from fe80::201:5cff:fe66:fe46: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=9.27 ms ^C --- fe80::201:5cff:fe66:fe46 ping statistics --- 2 packets transmitted, 2 received, 0% packet loss, time 1001ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 9.270/14.278/19.287/5.009 ms On 11/14/14, 7:12 AM, Jorge Amodio wrote:
Hi There, anybody seeing problems with TWC broadband access and IPv6? After a brief outage this morning I no longer have IPv6 in my residential line and don't see any IPv6 neighbor at the other end of the coax :-( -Jorge
Current thread:
- TWC IPv6 access ... Jorge Amodio (Nov 14)
- Re: TWC IPv6 access ... David Coulson (Nov 14)
- Re: TWC IPv6 access ... Jorge Amodio (Nov 14)
- Re: TWC IPv6 access ... Brandon Applegate (Nov 14)
- Re: TWC IPv6 access ... Alan Clegg (Nov 14)
- Re: TWC IPv6 access ... Jeremy Sliwinski (Nov 15)
- Re: TWC IPv6 access ... David Coulson (Nov 14)