nanog mailing list archives
Re: NAT IP and Google
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 11:20:21 -0700
On May 20, 2014, at 7:21 AM, Pui Edylie <email () edylie net> wrote:
Hi Everyone, May I know what is the best approach so that Google would not ban our Natted IP from time to time as it suspect it as a bot. Is there any official channel from Google which we could work with them for resolution? Thanks much! Best, Edy
The absolute best solution is to deploy IPv6 and deprecate NAT. If you’re looking for an IPv4-only solution, I don’t have a good answer for you. Owen
Current thread:
- NAT IP and Google Pui Edylie (May 20)
- Re: NAT IP and Google William Waites (May 20)
- Re: NAT IP and Google Harald Koch (May 20)
- Re: NAT IP and Google William Waites (May 20)
- RE: NAT IP and Google Tony Wicks (May 20)
- Re: NAT IP and Google Harald Koch (May 20)
- Re: NAT IP and Google William Waites (May 20)
- Re: NAT IP and Google Mark Andrews (May 20)
- Re: NAT IP and Google Owen DeLong (May 21)
- RE: NAT IP and Google Tony Wicks (May 21)
- Re: NAT IP and Google Valdis . Kletnieks (May 21)
- Re: NAT IP and Google Ca By (May 21)
- Re: NAT IP and Google Ca By (May 21)
- IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google) Jared Mauch (May 21)
- Re: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google) Livingood, Jason (May 22)
- Re: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google) Jared Mauch (May 22)
- Re: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google) Christopher Morrow (May 22)
- Re: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google) Sholes, Joshua (May 22)
- Re: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google) manning (May 22)
- RE: NAT IP and Google Tony Wicks (May 21)