nanog mailing list archives

Re: Observations of an Internet Middleman (Level3) (was: RIP Network Neutrality


From: Clayton Zekelman <clayton () MNSi Net>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 10:44:13 -0400


That's true for any given network topology up to the limit of capacity.

On cable plant, node splitting does incur significant costs.

May cable companies who built their fiber optic network with 200-500 customers per RF node are now finding they have to reduce that density. They don't have enough feeder fiber in their network to accommodate.

They have a few choices: 1) overlash more fiber, 2) use more WDM, 3) build more pop sites.

The incremental cost of delivering that one package above what the truck will hold is a doozie. It requires the delivery company to buy bigger trucks, or buy more trucks and run smaller routes.

At 10:30 AM 12/05/2014, joel jaeggli wrote:
Once you build the capacity to reach every delivery point every-day it's
maybe not enough to hope that people utilize that facility . decreasing
the cost per package requires higher unit volume. The incremental cost
of delivering the second package is much lower than the first.

---

Clayton Zekelman
Managed Network Systems Inc. (MNSi)
3363 Tecumseh Rd. E
Windsor, Ontario
N8W 1H4

tel. 519-985-8410
fax. 519-985-8409

Current thread: