nanog mailing list archives
Re: Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for 6500/7600 routers.
From: "Dobbins, Roland" <rdobbins () arbor net>
Date: Fri, 9 May 2014 08:14:20 +0000
On May 9, 2014, at 2:48 PM, Vitkovský Adam <adam.vitkovsky () swan sk> wrote:
With 6500/7600 I can understand they've been around for ages and no one anticipated the 512k limit back then.
Actually, it *was* anticipated. It's just that those who designed the ASIC didn't necessarily envision that it would still be in service, having gone through successive additional minor variations, for quite so long. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () arbor net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com> Luck is the residue of opportunity and design. -- John Milton
Current thread:
- Re: Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for 6500/7600 routers., (continued)
- Re: Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for 6500/7600 routers. Pete Lumbis (May 07)
- RE: Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for 6500/7600 routers. Tony Wicks (May 07)
- Re: Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for 6500/7600 routers. Nikolay Shopik (May 07)
- Re: Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for 6500/7600 routers. Irwin, Kevin (May 08)
- Re: Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for 6500/7600 routers. Mark Tinka (May 08)
- Re: Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for 6500/7600 routers. Nikolay Shopik (May 08)
- Re: Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for 6500/7600 routers. Mark Tinka (May 08)
- Re: Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for 6500/7600 routers. Michael Dikkema (May 08)
- Re: Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for 6500/7600 routers. Pete Lumbis (May 12)
- RE: Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for 6500/7600 routers. Vitkovský Adam (May 09)
- Re: Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for 6500/7600 routers. Dobbins, Roland (May 09)