nanog mailing list archives
Experience with Third-Party memory (Cisco)?
From: Shawn L <shawnl () up net>
Date: Thu, 8 May 2014 12:46:55 -0400
With all the talk lately about the growth in routes, I got to thinking about upgrading the memory in a couple of my routers. Does anyone have experience using third-party "guaranteed compatible" memory. With Cisco's discount it looks like I can upgrade for $5k vs $700 with third party memory. I'm just wondering if others have used it, and how it's performed, or if it isn't worth the risk. thanks
Current thread:
- Experience with Third-Party memory (Cisco)? Shawn L (May 08)
- Re: Experience with Third-Party memory (Cisco)? Tom Hill (May 08)
- Re: Experience with Third-Party memory (Cisco)? Patrick Boutilier (May 08)
- RE: Experience with Third-Party memory (Cisco)? Gary Dunaway (May 08)
- Re: Experience with Third-Party memory (Cisco)? Chris Knipe (May 08)
- Re: Experience with Third-Party memory (Cisco)? Geraint Jones (May 08)
- Re: Experience with Third-Party memory (Cisco)? Warren Bailey (May 08)