nanog mailing list archives
RE:Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for 6500/7600 routers.
From: Ca By <cb.list6 () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 6 May 2014 15:04:45 -0700
On May 6, 2014 12:32 PM, "Darin" <synack () live com> wrote:
And since those puppies are going to need a reload after adjustment make
sure your not exposed to the component decay issue for cards manufactured between 2005-2010 or you could have a interesting night.
We've hit that issue on three different 7600 chassis. Darin
You are not the only one, major manufacturing defects... http://www.cisco.com/go/memory
-----Original Message----- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces () nanog org] On Behalf Of Drew Weaver Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2014 10:39 AM To: 'nanog () nanog org' Subject: Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for 6500/7600 routers. Hi all, I am wondering if maybe we should make some kind of concerted effort to remind folks about the IPv4 routing table inching
closer
and closer to the 512K route mark. We are at about 94/95% right now of 512K. For most of us, the 512K route mark is arbitrary but for a lot of folks who may still be running 6500/7600 or other routers which
are by
default configured to crash and burn after 512K routes; it may be a
valuable
public service. Even if you don't have this scenario in your network today; chances are you connect to someone who connects to someone who
connects
to someone (etc...) that does. In case anyone wants to check on a 6500, you can run: show platform hardware capacity pfc and then look under L3 Forwarding Resources. Just something to think about before it becomes a story the community talks about for the next decade. -Drew
Current thread:
- Re: Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for 6500/7600 routers., (continued)
- Re: Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for 6500/7600 routers. Nick Hilliard (May 06)
- Re: Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for 6500/7600 routers. Jon Lewis (May 06)
- Re: Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for 6500/7600 routers. Jeff Kell (May 06)
- Re: Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for 6500/7600 routers. Vlade Ristevski (May 06)
- Re: Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for 6500/7600 routers. Rob Seastrom (May 06)
- RE: Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for 6500/7600routers. bedard.phil (May 06)
- Re: Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for 6500/7600routers. Pete Lumbis (May 06)
- Re: Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for 6500/7600 routers. Brandon Ewing (May 08)
- Re: Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for 6500/7600 routers. chiel (May 08)
- RE:Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for 6500/7600 routers. Darin (May 06)
- RE:Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for 6500/7600 routers. Ca By (May 06)
- Re: Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for 6500/7600 routers. Larry Sheldon (May 06)
- Re: Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for 6500/7600 routers. Irwin, Kevin (May 07)
- Fwd: Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for 6500/7600 routers. Shawn L (May 07)
- Re: Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for 6500/7600 routers. Alex Lesser (May 07)
- Re: Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for 6500/7600 routers. Pete Lumbis (May 07)
- RE: Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for 6500/7600 routers. Tony Wicks (May 07)
- Re: Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for 6500/7600 routers. Nikolay Shopik (May 07)
- Re: Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for 6500/7600 routers. Irwin, Kevin (May 08)
- Re: Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for 6500/7600 routers. Mark Tinka (May 08)
- Re: Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for 6500/7600 routers. Nikolay Shopik (May 08)
- Re: Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for 6500/7600 routers. Irwin, Kevin (May 07)