nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 isn't SMTP
From: "John Levine" <johnl () iecc com>
Date: 26 Mar 2014 04:18:58 -0000
3. Arguing about IPv6 in the context of requirements upon SMTP connections is playing that uncomfortable game with one�s own combat boots. And not particularly productive.
If you can figure out how to do effective spam filtering without looking at the IP addresses from which mail arrives, you will be in a position to make a whole lot of money. But, as always, I'm not holding my breath. R's, John PS: Note the word "effective".
Current thread:
- IPv6 isn't SMTP Cutler James R (Mar 25)
- Re: IPv6 isn't SMTP Paul S. (Mar 25)
- Re: IPv6 isn't SMTP John Levine (Mar 25)
- Re: IPv6 isn't SMTP Daniel Taylor (Mar 26)
- Re: IPv6 isn't SMTP rwebb () ropeguru com (Mar 26)
- Re: IPv6 isn't SMTP Andrew Sullivan (Mar 26)
- Re: IPv6 isn't SMTP Daniel Taylor (Mar 26)
- Re: IPv6 isn't SMTP Blake Hudson (Mar 26)
- Re: IPv6 isn't SMTP Jimmy Hess (Mar 26)
- Re: IPv6 isn't SMTP Blake Hudson (Mar 27)
- Re: IPv6 isn't SMTP Barry Shein (Mar 27)
- Re: IPv6 isn't SMTP Blake Hudson (Mar 27)
- Re: IPv6 isn't SMTP Barry Shein (Mar 27)
- Re: IPv6 isn't SMTP Daniel Taylor (Mar 26)