nanog mailing list archives
Re: [dns-wg] Global Vs local node data in www.root-servers.org
From: Joe Abley <jabley () hopcount ca>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 11:11:40 -0400
On 17 Mar 2014, at 10:27, manning bill <bmanning () isi edu> wrote:
alas, our service predates Joe’s marvelous text. “B” provides its services locally to its upstream ISPs. We don’t play routing tricks, impose routing policy, or attempt to influence prefix announcement.
In the taxonomy I just shared, that makes the origin nodes of B all "global nodes". To clarify though, I certainly wasn't trying to suggest that the things I described were new or original when I was writing in 2003. Anycast had already been in use for quite some time by a variety of people at that time. It's specifically the terms "local" and "global" in a DNS anycast context that I was apologising for :-) Joe
Current thread:
- Global Vs local node data in www.root-servers.org Anurag Bhatia (Mar 16)
- Re: [dns-wg] Global Vs local node data in www.root-servers.org Romeo Zwart (Mar 16)
- Message not available
- Re: [dns-wg] Global Vs local node data in www.root-servers.org Joe Abley (Mar 17)
- Re: [dns-wg] Global Vs local node data in www.root-servers.org manning bill (Mar 17)
- Re: [dns-wg] Global Vs local node data in www.root-servers.org Joe Abley (Mar 17)
- Re: [dns-wg] Global Vs local node data in www.root-servers.org bmanning (Mar 17)
- Re: [dns-wg] Global Vs local node data in www.root-servers.org Joe Abley (Mar 17)