nanog mailing list archives

Re: new DNS forwarder vulnerability


From: "Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood () cable comcast com>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 16:45:20 +0000

Well, at least all this CPE checks in for security updates every night so
this should be fixable. Oh wait, no, nevermind, they don't. :-(


This is getting to be the vulnerability of the week club for home gateway
devices - quite concerning.

JL

On 3/14/14, 12:05 PM, "Merike Kaeo" <merike () doubleshotsecurity com> wrote:


On Mar 14, 2014, at 7:06 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer () nic fr>
wrote:

On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 01:59:27PM +0000,
Nick Hilliard <nick () foobar org> wrote
a message of 10 lines which said:

did you characterise what dns servers / embedded kit were
vulnerable?

He said "We have not been able to nail this vulnerability down to a
single box or manufacturer" so it seems the answer is No.



It is my understanding  that many CPEs work off of same reference
implementation(s).  I haven't
had any cycles for this but with all the CPE issues out there it would be
interesting to have
a matrix of which CPEs utilize which reference implementation.  That may
start giving some clues.

Has someone / is someone doing this?

- merike




Current thread: