nanog mailing list archives

Re: BGP attributes through IGP


From: Blake Dunlap <ikiris () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2014 21:53:13 -0600

Mpls, GRE, line gun...

At some point, you want to stop beginning technical designs with "Doctor!
Doctor! It hurts when I do this. What can I do?"

The answer doesn't generally change, no matter how many times it's asked.


-Blake


On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 6:19 PM, Glen Turner <gdt () gdt id au> wrote:


Saku Ytti wrote:

It's essentially abusing (some what well-defined and interoperable
abuse) 32b
tag field for this purpose.

That's pretty much what the OSPF tag and the BGP's synchronisation with
OSPF were originally intended for.

However it's pretty much a design misfeature and you'd be happier with
iBGP over a tunnel

-glen


Current thread: