nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGP attributes through IGP
From: Blake Dunlap <ikiris () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2014 21:53:13 -0600
Mpls, GRE, line gun... At some point, you want to stop beginning technical designs with "Doctor! Doctor! It hurts when I do this. What can I do?" The answer doesn't generally change, no matter how many times it's asked. -Blake On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 6:19 PM, Glen Turner <gdt () gdt id au> wrote:
Saku Ytti wrote:It's essentially abusing (some what well-defined and interoperableabuse) 32btag field for this purpose.That's pretty much what the OSPF tag and the BGP's synchronisation with OSPF were originally intended for. However it's pretty much a design misfeature and you'd be happier with iBGP over a tunnel -glen
Current thread:
- BGP attributes through IGP Bryan Ashley (Mar 06)
- Re: BGP attributes through IGP Saku Ytti (Mar 06)
- Re: BGP attributes through IGP Bryan Ashley (Mar 06)
- Re: BGP attributes through IGP Elliot Finley (Mar 06)
- Re: BGP attributes through IGP Glen Turner (Mar 06)
- Re: BGP attributes through IGP Blake Dunlap (Mar 06)
- Re: BGP attributes through IGP Saku Ytti (Mar 06)
- Re: BGP attributes through IGP Bryan Ashley (Mar 06)
- Re: BGP attributes through IGP Saku Ytti (Mar 06)