nanog mailing list archives

Re: 3356 leaking routes out 3549 lately?


From: Hank Nussbacher <hank () efes iucc ac il>
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 21:51:20 +0300

At 15:42 28/03/2014 -0400, Chip Marshall wrote:

I have seen prefix leaking via AS3356 as well in the past year.

-Hank

On 2014-03-28, David Hubbard <dhubbard () dino hostasaurus com> sent:
> Has anyone had issues with Level 3 leaking advertisements out their
> Global Crossing AS3356 for customers of 3549, but not accepting the
> traffic back?  We've been encountering this more and more recently,
> bgpmon always detects it, and all we ever get from them is there's
> nothing wrong.  Today it affected CloudFlare's ability to talk to us.
> It seems to happen mostly with Europe and Asian peering points.
> Typically lasts five to ten minutes which makes me think someone working
> on merging the two networks is doing some 'no one will notice this'
> changes in the middle of the night.

I'm not sure if it's the same thing, but I've had a few alerts
from Renesys lately seeing a path to my AS via GLBX 3549 that
shouldn't exist, as we only have connections with Level 3 3356.

For example, Renesys reports "x 3549 33517" where it should only
be able to see "x 3356 33517" or maybe "x 3549 3356 33517".

(Due to Renesys policy, I can't know what x is)

--
Chip Marshall <chip () 2bithacker net>
http://2bithacker.net/



Current thread: