nanog mailing list archives
Re: short, two part question ICANN Vs. The World
From: "Justin M. Streiner" <streiner () cluebyfour org>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 17:24:17 -0400 (EDT)
On Mon, 23 Jun 2014, stovetop 202 wrote:
What do you mean by if anyone can see it?The lines are now closed off from the public's view.. but the textbooks still teach you that you should be able to have access freely. Is it the data on the hard line that you're worried people can see?
It would help if you'd provide an explanation of what you're trying to accomplish. It almost sounds like some combination of firewalls and proxy servers to provide some separation between your network(s) and the rest of the global Internet might be a more functional solution than doing odd things with DNS.
Bear in mind that a lot of the answers you get will probably be along the lines of "it depends" or "this might work", and come with an implied disclaimer (no guarantees). People might also recommend that you consider engaging a consultant to design/build what you need.
jms
Current thread:
- short, two part question ICANN Vs. The World stovetop 202 (Jun 23)
- RE: short, two part question ICANN Vs. The World Michael O Holstein (Jun 23)
- Re: short, two part question ICANN Vs. The World stovetop 202 (Jun 23)
- Re: short, two part question ICANN Vs. The World John Levine (Jun 23)
- Re: short, two part question ICANN Vs. The World Justin M. Streiner (Jun 23)
- Re: short, two part question ICANN Vs. The World stovetop 202 (Jun 23)
- Re: short, two part question ICANN Vs. The World Randy Bush (Jun 23)
- RE: short, two part question ICANN Vs. The World Keith Medcalf (Jun 23)
- Re: short, two part question ICANN Vs. The World manning bill (Jun 24)
- RE: short, two part question ICANN Vs. The World Michael O Holstein (Jun 23)