nanog mailing list archives
Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 23:13:10 -0400
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 5:24 PM, Lee Howard <Lee () asgard org> wrote:
On 6/19/14 4:30 PM, "Christopher Morrow" <morrowc.lists () gmail com> wrote:On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Lee Howard <Lee () asgard org> wrote:How does IPv6 to end users make IPv4 unnecessary for growth, if enterprises and content providers haven't deployed IPv6?content folk are mostly getting v6 done already, right? (minus AWS/etc which are on-plan to deploy as near as I can tell) I don't think enterprise folk matter here, they'll get to v6 when they have enough problems related to v4 content reachability... and when they try the ISP network ought to be prepared to deal with them.7.94% Google hits in the U.S. come from IPv6 addresses. http://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html#tab=per-country-ipv6-ad option 7.29% of web sites have a working AAAA. http://www.employees.org/~dwing/aaaa-stats/which content providers (large-ish ones) are lagging still?https://www.vyncke.org/ipv6status/detailed.php?country=us Microsoft: live.com, Bing, MSN, microsoft.com
that's a bummer I had thought they were doing v6 :( (same for twitter actually) <longer list elided> So, I was focusing on the end-user (Consumer) set because given enough migration there that should push more application folk in the right direction. I think ipv6 still suffers from the chicken/egg problem: 1) users aren't asking so isps aren't selling/doing 1b) ISPs still ahve v4 or a solution (they think) to no-more-v4 and can keep rolling new customers out 2) content places have no one they can't reach today because there's v4 to everyone that they care about 3) both sides still playing chicken. oh well, see you on this same conversation in another 18 months time?
Current thread:
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion, (continued)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Justin M. Streiner (Jun 19)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Christopher Morrow (Jun 19)
- RE: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Edward Arthurs (Jun 19)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 19)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Christopher Morrow (Jun 19)
- RE: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Edward Arthurs (Jun 19)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Christopher Morrow (Jun 19)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Lee Howard (Jun 19)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Christopher Morrow (Jun 19)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Lee Howard (Jun 19)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Christopher Morrow (Jun 19)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Lee Howard (Jun 20)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Matthew Petach (Jun 21)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Owen DeLong (Jun 19)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Karl Auer (Jun 19)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Vlade Ristevski (Jun 20)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion John Levine (Jun 19)
- Canada and IPv6 (was: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion) Sadiq Saif (Jun 19)
- Re: Canada and IPv6 (was: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion) William F. Maton Sotomayor (Jun 19)
- Re: Canada and IPv6 (was: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion) jim deleskie (Jun 19)
- Re: Canada and IPv6 (was: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion) William F. Maton Sotomayor (Jun 20)