nanog mailing list archives

Re: Netflix To Cogent To World


From: Adam Rothschild <asr () latency net>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 13:18:30 -0400

Comcast’s position is that they could buy transit from some obscure networks who don’t really have a viable transit 
offering, such as DT and China Telecom, and implement some convoluted load balancing mechanism to scale up traffic.

(I believe this was in one of Jason Livingood’s posts to broadbandreports, unfortunately I don’t have a citation handy.)

On Jul 23, 2014, at 1:09 PM, Phil Rosenthal <pr () isprime com> wrote:

With this war of blog posts — perhaps Netflix should ask this question:

Who can we buy transit from who has sufficient peering capacity to reach Comcast’s and Verizon’s customers?

-P

On Jul 23, 2014, at 1:00 PM, Adam Rothschild <asr () latency net> wrote:

I think the confusion by Jay and others is that there is a plethora of commercial options available for sending 
traffic to Comcast or Verizon, at scale and absent congestion.  I contend that there is not.

I, too, have found Netflix highly responsive and professional, as a peering partner...

$0.02,
-a

On Jul 23, 2014, at 11:31 AM, Bob Evans <bob () FiberInternetCenter com> wrote:

Most likely Netflix writes policies to filter known cogent conflict
peers...Chances are they use cogent to reach the cogent customer base and
other peers.  I know from experience that peering directly with Netflix
works very well....they don't depend heavily on transit delivery if direct
peering is possible.

Thank You
Bob Evans
CTO




If I were Netflix, why would I buy all my transit from Cogent[1], given
Cogent's propensity for getting into peering fights with people
*already*,
even before *I* start sending them 1000:1 asymmetric outbound traffic?

Perhaps Netflix expect this to be an ongoing problem with moree ISPs
asking them to pay to deliver (following Bretts lead ;-), so with their
previous transits experience why would they continue to buy from pussies?

So why would Cogent offer Netflix a helluva deal?

Previous events have shown Cognet only use live rounds, so why would they
not take the opportunity to get a bigger gun?

Mutually assured domination. Perhaps one will buy the other sometime.

brandon







Current thread: