nanog mailing list archives

Re: Cheap LSN/CGN/NAT444 Solution


From: Daniel Corbe <corbe () corbe net>
Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2014 11:19:33 -0400


I use the Thunder for CGNAT but I've never tried to do NAT444 with it.  

The thing I like about A10 is their TAC is awesome.  If they say the box
supports something, then their TAC people will break their backs to try
and get it working for you.  

-Daniel

Skeeve Stevens <skeeve+nanog () eintellegonetworks com> writes:

Hi all,

I have had the A10 Thunder platform recommended off-list by a couple of
people and by all reading it looks good, but anyone can do good marketing
material.

Anyone else here used the Thunder (looking at the 930 or 1030S, maybe even
the vThunder) as a NAT444/LSN solution?


...Skeeve

*Skeeve Stevens - *eintellego Networks Pty Ltd
skeeve () eintellegonetworks com ; www.eintellegonetworks.com

Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve

facebook.com/eintellegonetworks ;  <http://twitter.com/networkceoau>
linkedin.com/in/skeeve

experts360: https://expert360.com/profile/d54a9

twitter.com/theispguy ; blog: www.theispguy.com


The Experts Who The Experts Call
Juniper - Cisco - Cloud - Consulting - IPv4 Brokering


On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Skeeve Stevens <
skeeve+nanog () eintellegonetworks com> wrote:

Hi all,

I am sure this is something that a reasonable number of people would have
done on this list.

I am after a LSN/CGN/NAT444 solution to put about 1000 Residential profile
NBN speeds (fastest 100/40) services behind.

I am looking at a Cisco ASR1001/2, pfSense and am willing to consider
other options, including open source.... Obviously the cheaper the better.

This solution is for v4 only, and needs to consider the profile of the
typical residential users.  Any pitfalls would be helpful to know - as in
what will and and more importantly wont work - or any work-arounds which
may work.

This solution is not designed to be long lasting (maybe 6-9 months)... it
is to get the solution going for up to 1000 users, and once it reaches that
point then funds will be freed up to roll out a more robust, carrier-grade
and long term solution (which will include v6). So no criticism on not
doing v6 straight up please.

Happy for feedback off-list of any solutions that people have found work
well...

Note, I am in Australia so any vendors which aren't easily accessible down
here, won't be useful.


...Skeeve

*Skeeve Stevens - *eintellego Networks Pty Ltd
skeeve () eintellegonetworks com ; www.eintellegonetworks.com

Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve

facebook.com/eintellegonetworks ;  <http://twitter.com/networkceoau>
linkedin.com/in/skeeve

experts360: https://expert360.com/profile/d54a9

twitter.com/theispguy ; blog: www.theispguy.com


The Experts Who The Experts Call
Juniper - Cisco - Cloud - Consulting - IPv4 Brokering



Current thread: