nanog mailing list archives

Re: Next steps in extortion case - ideas?


From: "Justin M. Streiner" <streiner () cluebyfour org>
Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2014 16:02:29 -0400 (EDT)

On Sat, 5 Jul 2014, C. A. Fillekes wrote:

Furthermore, since the internet is everywhere, I pointed out (or did you
stop reading after I mentioned that we don't actually know the gender of
the scammer?) Markus has the option of pursuing this in a jurisdiction
where the penalties for criminal defamation are the harshest.  It would not
have to be in the US.

Unless one or more of the plaintiffs is located a country with the harshest penalities, or a plaintiff can otherwise demonstrate how people in country XYZ are being harmed by the scammer's actions, I don't see that going very far. A plaintiff in Germany trying to bring a case to court in Singapore against a defendant in the United States isn't going to work so well. I am not a lawyer, but my guess is that the case would be thrown out because the plaintiff would lack standing to bring a case to court in that country.

Yes, the global Internet is a global communications tool, but that doesn't mean you can cherry-pick which country to use in trying a case just because
the extortion is taking place over the Internet.

Finally, you fail to address the one very simple way I described to
determine who this scammer is: follow the money.  Make a small partial
payment on this supposed "debt" and see who cashes the check.  Much easier
than trying to follow "him" around on the internet, though that would be
made easier in the course of negotiating a partial payment.

This is much easier to do once law enforcement agencies are engaged. They can trace the money trail more throughly and effectively than you or I can, as civilians.

jms


Current thread: