Re: BGP Session

[Abuse Contact <stopabuseandreport () gmail com>]

Yeah, that's probably the best idea in this situation. I've been really
interested in BGP but didn't know where to start, I'll read all the books
that you guys put up above and start reading them.
Also, referring to what you said
"If you are not peering with TATA, then your routes would not go to TATA
first.  (unless the next-hop is indirect and that brings up other
fundamental routing things that you should learn about)"
Yeah, I meant that if I was getting a Transit service from them. Like, if
using a DC like Equinix, you have access to countless amounts of
opportunities to use Transits from virtually any provider, if I were to
contact TATA and ask for a transit, I'd set that up in BGP, but I'm
confused on how. I'll look into Fundamental routing.

Thanks!


On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 10:29 AM, Scott Morris <swm () emanon com> wrote:

> Fundamental routing training would greatly help you here.  I would suggest
> looking for that.
>
> If you are not peering with TATA, then your routes would not go to TATA
> first.  (unless the next-hop is indirect and that brings up other
> fundamental routing things that you should learn about)
>
> AS13335 is not TATA.  So if this is what your provider gave you, one first
> assumes you¹d be directly connected to them (that¹s one of the rules in
> BGP¹s RFC for external connections)..  If you have multiple providers, you
> may have multiple peers.  Each one would give you information.
>
> But like others have stated, I would strongly suggest you stop your
> testing for the moment and either hire someone to help or take some time
> to learn the basics on there.  Otherwise, successful or not, your testing
> will really have no meaning to you.
>
> Just my two cents.
>
> Scott
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Abuse Contact <stopabuseandreport () gmail com>
> Date: Saturday, July 19, 2014 at 1:12 PM
> To: Jonathan Lassoff <jof () thejof com>
> Cc: "nanog () nanog org" <nanog () nanog org>
> Subject: Re: BGP Session
>
> > Yeah, we're using it for an anycasted node but like, I'm confused on
> > certain parts like, just a really basic question.
> > When doing things like
> >
> > conf t
> > router bgp AS1337
> >
> > neighbor 208.54.128.0 remote-as AS13335
> > neighbor 208.54.128.0 description BGP with Upstream
> > neighbor 208.54.128.0 password "lolpass"
> >
> > address-family ipv4
> > no synchronization
> > neighbor 208.54.128.0 activate
> > neighbor 208.54.128.0 soft-reconfiguration inboung
> >
> > I'm confused on when doing this, would I need to state like
> >
> > First go to AS13335 then go to TATA then go to my server or would it just
> > automatically do that or would my provider do that? I'm confused on that.
> > how would I state multiple peers.....?
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Jonathan Lassoff <jof () thejof com>
> wrote:
> > > An Anycasting node. For example, as part of a reliable DNS service.
> > > A /24 is usually the smallest prefix length that is portably accepted.
> > >
> > > Also, applications where connections need to appear to be coming from
> > > many
> > > source IPs.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Saturday, July 19, 2014, Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists () gmail com
> >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > A single linux box with a whole /24 on it? What sort of use case is
> > > > that,
> > > > BTW?
> > > >  On 19-Jul-2014 10:26 pm, "Abuse Contact"
> > > > <stopabuseandreport () gmail com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I know, the DC is going to be giving me a BGP session on their router
> > > > so I
> > > > > can set it up, I'm not using a Linux server as a router.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 9:04 AM, William Herrin <bill () herrin us>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 4:05 AM, Abuse Contact
> > > > > > <stopabuseandreport () gmail com> wrote:
> > > > > > > So I just purchased a Dedicated server from this one company and
> > > > I
> > > > > have a
> > > > > > > /24 IPv4 block that I bought from a company on WebHostingTalk,
> > > > but
> > > > I am
> > > > > > > clueless on how to setup the /24 IPv4 block using the BGP
> > > > Session. I
> > > > > want
> > > > > > > to set it up to run through their network as if it was one of
> > > > their
> > > > > IPs,
> > > > > > > etc. I keep seeing things like iBGP (which I think means like a
> > > > inner
> > > > > > > routing BGP) and eBGP (what I'm talking about??) but I have no
> > > > idea
> > > > how
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > > set those up or which one I would need.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Howdy,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Unless you have (1) a real router available, not a just a server
> > > > and
> > > > > > (2) an expert available to help you with your first BGP
> > > > configuration
> > > > > > I strongly recommend you simply ask your service provider to
> > > > announce
> > > > > > the /24 to the Internet on your behalf.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Server-based BGP software like Quagga for Linux is reasonably good
> > > > but
> > > > > > it should absolutely not be involved in your _first_ attempt to
> > > > > > connect with the Internet's default-free zone. Simple mistakes with
> > > > > > eBGP can cause tremendous damage to other folks on the Internet.
> > > > Trial
> > > > > > and error is simply not OK. If it isn't worth it to you to buy a
> > > > > > BGP-capable router then you also aren't prepared to make the
> > > > > > investment in learning it takes to use BGP without causing harm.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > Bill Herrin
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > William Herrin ................ herrin () dirtside com
> bill () herrin us
> > > > > > Owner, Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/>
> > > > > > Can I solve your unusual networking challenges?