nanog mailing list archives
Re: Internet Routing Registries - RADb, etc
From: Nick Hilliard <nick () foobar org>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 17:21:12 +0000
On 16/01/2014 14:32, Blake Hudson wrote:
Thanks for the responses, these objects are all older. However, none of them are stale or from previous owners, allocations, etc. Each of these objects were posted to their respective IRR's after the IP space was allocated to us. This leads me to believe that the individual IRR's really do very little checking for accuracy and their usefulness is then questionable.
Oh yeah. I got hit by that sort of thing a week or two back. It wasn't origin: AS14179 / mnt-by: MAINT-AS28071, by any chance? AS14179 have been hijacking chunks of space from the various registries. Nick
Current thread:
- Internet Routing Registries - RADb, etc Blake Hudson (Jan 15)
- Re: Internet Routing Registries - RADb, etc Nick Hilliard (Jan 15)
- RE: Internet Routing Registries - RADb, etc Eric Krichbaum (Jan 15)
- Re: Internet Routing Registries - RADb, etc Blake Hudson (Jan 16)
- Re: Internet Routing Registries - RADb, etc Nick Hilliard (Jan 16)
- RE: Internet Routing Registries - RADb, etc Jon Lewis (Jan 16)
- Re: Internet Routing Registries - RADb, etc Nick Hilliard (Jan 16)
- Re: Internet Routing Registries - RADb, etc Jeroen Massar (Jan 16)
- Re: Internet Routing Registries - RADb, etc Joe Abley (Jan 17)
- RE: Internet Routing Registries - RADb, etc Eric Krichbaum (Jan 15)
- Re: Internet Routing Registries - RADb, etc Nick Hilliard (Jan 15)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Internet Routing Registries - RADb, etc courtneysmith (Jan 16)
- Re: Internet Routing Registries - RADb, etc Blake Hudson (Jan 16)