Re: EIGRP support !Cisco

["Nick Olsen" <nick () flhsi com>]

This is what I figured from a quick googling. Just wanted to make sure I 
wasn't missing anything..

Thanks!

Nick Olsen
 Network Operations 
(855) FLSPEED  x106

----------------------------------------
From: "Nick Hilliard" <nick () foobar org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2014 1:03 PM
To: nick () flhsi com, nanog () nanog org
Subject: Re: EIGRP support !Cisco

On 08/01/2014 17:52, Nick Olsen wrote:
> Completely agree. But this is needed to integrate into an existing 
network.
> OSPF would've been my first choice.

you'll need to pay cisco tax then.  Cisco opened up most of eigrp to the
ietf as an informational rfc, but didn't release anything related to eigrp
stub areas.  This means that the ietf release is not that useful if a
vendor wanted feature parity with cisco's implementation.  So far I'm not
aware of any vendors who have implemented it.  Maybe some will do so in 
future.

Nick