nanog mailing list archives

Re: Filter on IXP


From: Jérôme Nicolle <jerome () ceriz fr>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 18:03:01 +0100

Le 28/02/2014 17:52, Nick Hilliard a écrit :
this will break horribly as soon as you have an IXP member which provides
transit to other multihomed networks.

It could break if filters are based on announced prefixes. That's
preciselly why uRPF is often useless.

On the other hand, if a member provides transit, he will add its
customer prefixes to RaDB / RIPEdb with appropriate route objects and
the ACL will be updated accordingly. Shouldn't break there.

-- 
Jérôme Nicolle
+33 6 19 31 27 14


Current thread: