nanog mailing list archives

Re: Question on Route-Set for Arin DB


From: Faisal Imtiaz <faisal () snappytelecom net>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 23:30:33 +0000 (GMT)

I am a newbie at it as well, having said that.. the short answer to your question is  YES to aut-num and NO to  
route-set ..
but the longer answer will always be based on how you are using the IRR....

If you are doing this for the most common, basic reason, that one of your upstream is requiring it.. then you may have 
to ask them.
 (in most cases aut-num for your ASN and route object for your routes is needed at minimum)

BTW, I am curious, if you did not create an aut-num object, what did you enter as origin: for your route objects ?


Regards

Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet & Telecom
7266 SW 48 Street
Miami, FL 33155
Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232

Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: Support () Snappytelecom net 

----- Original Message -----
From: "Joseph Jenkins" <joe () breathe-underwater com>
To: nanog () nanog org
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2014 5:28:39 PM
Subject: Question on Route-Set for Arin DB

So the Routing Database is something that I am just learning about and trying
to find out if I need to create a Route-set or not.  I just created my
MNTNER ID and I also created the Route Objects for my two /24s that were
given to my by my carriers.  Do I need a route-set or aut-num object
created?

Still trying to get my head wrapped around the need for this.  I read through
this tutorial:

http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog51/presentations/Sunday/NANOG51.Talk34.NANOG51%20IRR%20Tutorial.pdf

and didn't get a really clear idea as to if I needed these.

TIA,

Joe



Current thread: