nanog mailing list archives
Re: Twinax trivia check (was Re: Is there such a thing as a 10GBase-T SFP+ transciever)
From: joel jaeggli <joelja () bogus com>
Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2014 12:27:58 -0800
On 2/2/14, 7:30 AM, Larry Sheldon wrote:
On 2/1/2014 10:40 PM, Jima wrote:+1. Cisco calls them Twinax, HP calls them DACs. I don't know what anyone else calls them as it hasn't come up in conversation for me.I thought "Twinax" was an IBMish MILSPEC term.
twinax could refer to a specific technology or to the presence of dual inner conductors e.g. in contrast to coax or triax.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Current thread:
- Twinax trivia check (was Re: Is there such a thing as a 10GBase-T SFP+ transciever) Larry Sheldon (Feb 02)
- Re: Twinax trivia check (was Re: Is there such a thing as a 10GBase-T SFP+ transciever) joel jaeggli (Feb 02)
- Re: Twinax trivia check (was Re: Is there such a thing as a 10GBase-T SFP+ transciever) Jay Ashworth (Feb 02)
- Re: Twinax trivia check (was Re: Is there such a thing as a 10GBase-T SFP+ transciever) Bryan Tong (Feb 02)
- Re: Twinax trivia check (was Re: Is there such a thing as a 10GBase-T SFP+ transciever) Jeff Kell (Feb 02)
- RE: Twinax trivia check (was Re: Is there such a thing as a 10GBase-T SFP+ transciever) Murphy-Olson, Daniel E. (Feb 02)
- Re: Twinax trivia check (was Re: Is there such a thing as a 10GBase-T SFP+ transciever) Brian Loveland (Feb 02)
- Re: Twinax trivia check (was Re: Is there such a thing as a 10GBase-T SFP+ transciever) Jay Ashworth (Feb 02)
- Re: Twinax trivia check (was Re: Is there such a thing as a 10GBase-T SFP+ transciever) joel jaeggli (Feb 02)