Re: BCP38 is hard; let's go shopping!

[joel jaeggli <joelja () bogus com>]

On 2/5/14, 1:46 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "joel jaeggli" <joelja () bogus com>
>
> > > As I've noted, I'm not sure I believe that's true of current generation
> > > gear, and if it *is*, then it should cost manufacturers business.
> >
> > There are boxes that haven't aged out of the network yet where that's an
> > issue, some are more datacenter-centric than others. force10 e1200 was
> > one platform that had this limitation for example.
>
> So making sure manufacturers are producing gear that's BCP38-compliant,
> and buyers have it on their tick-list, is still a productive goal, too.

it is...  The products are probably close to the end of their sales
life, but they'll likely be around for a while.

> Cheers,
> -- jra

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature