nanog mailing list archives

Re: Why won't providers source-filter attacks? Simple.


From: Mark Andrews <marka () isc org>
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 09:00:39 +1100


In message <977303.7242.1391542533531.JavaMail.root () benjamin baylink com>, Jay 
Ashworth writes:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Ferguson" <fergdawgster () mykolab com>

(And yes, I know that in the first case, it urges the customer to
cough up the bucks, and in the second case, it's usually not a
revenue generator)

It's a dichotomy that is... unexplainable for me personally.

Nope: it's easy to explain; you merely have to be a cynical bastard:

Attack traffic takes up bandwidth.

Providers sell bandwidth.

It *is in their commercial best interest (read: maximizing shareholder
value) *NOT* to filter out DOS, DDOS, and spam traffic until their hand is 
forced -- it's actually their fiduciary duty not to.

Then the need to be made criminally liable for the damage that it causes.
Yes, the directors of these companies need to serve gaol time.

*THIS* is the problem we have to fix.

Cheers,
-- jra
-- 
Jay R. Ashworth                  Baylink                       jra () baylink co
m
Designer                     The Things I Think                       RFC 210
0
Ashworth & Associates       http://www.bcp38.info          2000 Land Rover DI
I
St Petersburg FL USA      BCP38: Ask For It By Name!           +1 727 647 127
4

-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka () isc org


Current thread: