nanog mailing list archives

Re: 10Gb iPerf kit?

From: Pete Mundy <pete () fiberphone co nz>
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 21:01:08 +1300

On 8/12/2014, at 5:48 AM, Teleric Team <teleric-lists () outlook com> wrote:

Again, with 64byte packet size? Or are you talking MTU?


You have a very good point. My 1gig tests have always been for throughput rather than pps, and therefore was using MTU 
sized packets and though would be much less load on the CPU.

Pete

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description:

Current thread:

Re: 10Gb iPerf kit? Saku Ytti (Dec 06)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: 10Gb iPerf kit? Pete Mundy (Dec 06)
  - Re: 10Gb iPerf kit? Saku Ytti (Dec 07)
    - Re: 10Gb iPerf kit? Matthew Walster (Dec 07)
  - Re: 10Gb iPerf kit? Nick Hilliard (Dec 07)
  - RE: 10Gb iPerf kit? Teleric Team (Dec 07)
    - Re: 10Gb iPerf kit? Roy Hirst (Dec 08)
    - Re: 10Gb iPerf kit? Roy Hirst (Dec 08)
    - Re: 10Gb iPerf kit? Pete Mundy (Dec 09)