nanog mailing list archives

Re: [j-nsp] Viability of EX4300 in a primarily l3 environment?

From: "Paul S." <contact () winterei se>
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2014 21:15:01 +0900

On 8/6/2014 午後 09:13, Vincent Bernat wrote:

  ❦  6 août 2014 20:54 +0900, "Paul S." <contact () winterei se> :

Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't OSPF require the AFL license
anyway to be 'legitly' ran?

OSPF does not need a feature license on those models (it is needed on
EX2200). AFL is needed for BGP, IS-IS and MPLS.


3300 too, apparently -- thanks for the correction.