nanog mailing list archives
Re: ASR9K xml agent vs netconf
From: "Dale W. Carder" <dwcarder () wisc edu>
Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2014 08:32:28 -0500
Thus spake Jeremy (jbaino () gmail com) on Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 03:07:19PM -0700:
I'm currently working on writing some automation around the ASR9K platform and I've been looking at both the netconf and xml interfaces. Anyone have experience with either? It looks like the XML interface is much more feature rich, supporting both config and operational state objects where netconf is limited to config only. Currently I'm leaning towards the xml interface,
I wasted a week of my life trying to get xml interface on n9k to work correctly. I would never use it again, as it obviously gets no QA. There is likely a fundamental design flaw in that the cli is not itself an xml client like you see on other platforms. The XML interface, and CLI (presumably netconf) may all be distinct clients to sysdb. I did get (3) ddts' assigned, related to missing data compared to cli, endian issues, etc. My recommendation is DO NOT USE IT. I went back to screen scraping for ios-xr. Related to this and other issues, all of our subsequent purchases have been MX. Dale AS{59,2381,3128}
Current thread:
- ASR9K xml agent vs netconf Jeremy (Aug 01)
- Re: ASR9K xml agent vs netconf Randy Bush (Aug 02)
- Re: ASR9K xml agent vs netconf Dale W. Carder (Aug 05)
- Re: ASR9K xml agent vs netconf Corey Touchet (Aug 05)
- Re: ASR9K xml agent vs netconf Hugo Slabbert (Aug 05)
- Re: ASR9K xml agent vs netconf Jared Mauch (Aug 14)
- Re: ASR9K xml agent vs netconf Corey Touchet (Aug 05)