nanog mailing list archives

Re: Prefix hijacking, how to prevent and fix currently


From: Matthew Kaufman <matthew () matthew at>
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 14:46:05 -0700

I look forward to the ARIN fee schedule for legacy IPv4 holder RPKI registrations.

Matthew Kaufman

(Sent from my iPhone)

On Aug 28, 2014, at 8:28 PM, Mark Andrews <marka () isc org> wrote:


   See "whois -r AS43239".

   The long term solution is to deploy RPKI and only use
   transits which use RPKI.  No RPKI support => no business.
   Additionally make RPKI a peering requirement.

   Mark

In message <CAAjbWEr_o+yQY1T72JMvJ_Nw2Eu2L7=TzZ0dc33mhodo5JB=yw () mail gmail com>
, Tarun Dua writes:
AS Number 43239
AS Name SPETSENERGO-AS SpetsEnergo Ltd.

Has started hijacking our IPv4 prefix, while this prefix was NOT in
production, it worries us that it was this easy for someone to hijack
it.

http://bgp.he.net/AS43239#_prefixes

103.20.212.0/22 <- This belongs to us.

103.238.232.0/22 KNS Techno Integrators Pvt. Ltd.
193.43.33.0/24 hydrocontrol S.C.R.L.
193.56.146.0/24 TRAPIL - Societe des Transports Petroliers par Pipeline

Where do we complain to get this fixed.

-Tarun
AS132420
-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka () isc org


Current thread: