Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today

[Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>]

I believe at one point, SPRINT had in the RADB (and actively advertised) 0.0.0.0/2, 64.0.0.0/2, 128.0.0.0/2, and 
192.0.0.0/2 under something called  “Quarter Default Route, see Rational Default Project” or words to that effect.

I could be wrong. It was a long time ago and I barely remember SPRINT any more.

Owen

On Aug 13, 2014, at 9:47 PM, Steve Noble <snoble () sonn com> wrote:

> Sprint also had 192/2 in the RADB :)
>
> manning bill wrote:
> > Sprint used to proxy aggregate… I remember 128.0.0.0/3
> >
> > the real question, imho, is if folks are going to look into their crystal balls and roadmap where the default 
> > offered is a /32 (either v4 or v6)
> > and plan accordingly, or just slap another bandaid on the oozing wound...
> >
> > /bill
> > PO Box 12317
> > Marina del Rey, CA 90295
> > 310.322.8102