nanog mailing list archives

Re: US patent 5473599


From: Henning Brauer <hb-nanog () bsws de>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 17:07:16 +0200

* Nick Hilliard <nick () foobar org> [2014-04-22 15:33]:
On 22/04/2014 12:31, Henning Brauer wrote:
it does NOT cover carp, not at all.
that is a political statement rather than a legal opinion.  If you read the
patent, it's pretty obvious that when you have a group of carp-enabled
devices providing a stable gateway IP address, and these devices are
routing traffic received via the carp published address, this configuration
provides the same functionality that's described in the patent claims.
This hasn't been tested in court and neither of us is a lawyer and the
patent seems to have expired, so it's academic at this stage.

it is academic, indeed.
I was involved with carp's creation, we did all the work to make sure
it just avoids being covered by the patent. and that included getting
legal advice.

-- 
Henning Brauer, hb () bsws de, henning () openbsd org
BS Web Services GmbH, AG Hamburg HRB 128289, http://bsws.de
Full-Service ISP - Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Services
Dedicated Servers, Rootservers, Application Hosting


Current thread: