Re: Requirements for IPv6 Firewalls

[William Herrin <bill () herrin us>]

On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Simon Perreault <simon () per reau lt> wrote:
> Le 2014-04-18 13:25, Mike Hale a écrit :
> > I agree with Bill.  You can poopoo NAT all you want, but it's a fact
> > of most networks and will continue to remain so until you can make a
> > compelling case to move away from it.
>
> Does that mean all IPv6 firewalls should support NAT?
>
> Remember, we're aiming for a base set of requirements applying to all
> IPv6 firewalls.

Your document specifies "Enterprise" firewalls. Frankly I think that's
wise. Consumer and enterprise users have very different needs and very
different cost points.

Regards,
Bill Herrin


-- 
William D. Herrin ................ herrin () dirtside com  bill () herrin us
3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004