nanog mailing list archives

Re: DMARC -> CERT?

From: "John Levine" <johnl () iecc com>
Date: 14 Apr 2014 22:36:00 -0000

In article <CAL9jLaZJjPpZ7vzw2uE4QFQwrkcBu7cS1eD3Uu1NHUDHxxkthQ () mail gmail com> you write:

On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Scott Howard <scott () doc net au> wrote:

Whilst I don't agree with the way that Yahoo has done this (particularly
around communication),


how could they have communicated this better? how can we all learn from this?


Well, telling people in advance that they were planning to do it
rather than just dropping it on the world over the weekend would be a
good start.

R's,
John

Current thread:

Re: DMARC -> CERT?, (continued)
- - - Re: DMARC -> CERT? Private Sender (Apr 16)
    - Re: DMARC -> CERT? Jim Popovitch (Apr 16)
    - Re: DMARC -> CERT? Private Sender (Apr 17)
    - Re: DMARC -> CERT? Michael Thomas (Apr 17)
    - Re: DMARC -> CERT? Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 17)
    - Re: DMARC -> CERT? Michael Thomas (Apr 17)
    - Re: DMARC -> CERT? Miles Fidelman (Apr 17)
    - Message not available
    - Re: DMARC -> CERT? Larry Sheldon (Apr 16)
    - Re: DMARC -> CERT? Jim Popovitch (Apr 16)
    - Re: DMARC -> CERT? Miles Fidelman (Apr 14)
    - Re: DMARC -> CERT? John Levine (Apr 14)
    - Re: DMARC -> CERT? Rich Kulawiec (Apr 14)
    - Re: DMARC -> CERT? Leo Bicknell (Apr 14)
    - Re: DMARC -> CERT? Miles Fidelman (Apr 14)