nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGPMON Alert Questions
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 12:49:10 +0200
On Tuesday, April 08, 2014 11:24:07 AM Jac Kloots wrote:
We (SURFnet, AS1103) are in the same position and I wrote an article about the evaluation we did before deciding on dropping invalids (https://blog.surfnet.nl/?p=3159)
Sounds great, Jac! In your report, you mention that you're not validating customer prefixes. Is this still the case? Mark.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Current thread:
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions, (continued)
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions Mark Tinka (Apr 06)
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions Benno Overeinder (Apr 04)
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions Mark Tinka (Apr 05)
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions Anthony Williams (Apr 03)
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions Mark Tinka (Apr 03)
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions Nick Hilliard (Apr 03)
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions Mark Tinka (Apr 03)
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions Mark Tinka (Apr 03)
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions Randy Bush (Apr 03)
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions Jac Kloots (Apr 08)
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions Mark Tinka (Apr 08)
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions Jac Kloots (Apr 08)
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions Mark Tinka (Apr 08)
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions Randy Bush (Apr 10)
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions Mark Tinka (Apr 10)
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions Randy Bush (Apr 10)
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions Mark Tinka (Apr 10)
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions Tony Tauber (Apr 10)
- RE: BGPMON Alert Questions John York (Apr 03)
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 02)
- Re: BGPMON Alert Questions Randy Bush (Apr 02)