nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGP Attribute 128
From: Saku Ytti <saku () ytti fi>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 09:39:15 +0300
On (2013-09-26 17:02 -0500), Jared Mauch wrote:
I certainly agree. There is a very narrow case for filtering 128 as it's a VPN attribute that should not be in the big-I Internet.
I can't think of application right now, but I'm not convinced there isn't application for 128 over INET. I know RFC strictly speaks about VPN deployment, but I wouldn't be too surprised if someone would have good use-case for tunneling attributes over INET. -- ++ytti
Current thread:
- BGP Attribute 128 Jared Mauch (Sep 25)
- Re: BGP Attribute 128 Saku Ytti (Sep 26)
- Re: BGP Attribute 128 Jared Mauch (Sep 26)
- Re: BGP Attribute 128 Saku Ytti (Sep 26)
- Re: BGP Attribute 128 Jared Mauch (Sep 26)
- Re: BGP Attribute 128 Saku Ytti (Sep 26)