nanog mailing list archives

Re: BGP Attribute 128


From: Saku Ytti <saku () ytti fi>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 09:39:15 +0300

On (2013-09-26 17:02 -0500), Jared Mauch wrote:

I certainly agree. There is a very narrow case for filtering 128 as it's a VPN attribute that should not be in the 
big-I Internet.

I can't think of application right now, but I'm not convinced there isn't
application for 128 over INET.
I know RFC strictly speaks about VPN deployment, but I wouldn't be too
surprised if someone would have good use-case for tunneling attributes over
INET.

-- 
  ++ytti


Current thread: