nanog mailing list archives
Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size
From: Patrick <nanog () haller ws>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 17:23:26 +0800
On 2013-09-26 08:52, bmanning () vacation karoshi com wrote:
sounds just like folks in 1985, talking about IPv4...
Yeah, but who doesn't run CIDR now? Get everyone in the IPv6 pool now; we'll inevitably add hacks later....
Current thread:
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size, (continued)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Randy Bush (Sep 24)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Edward Dore (Sep 24)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Owen DeLong (Sep 24)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Bryan Socha (Sep 24)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Nathanael C. Cariaga (Sep 24)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size joel jaeggli (Sep 24)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Mikael Abrahamsson (Sep 24)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Måns Nilsson (Sep 24)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Owen DeLong (Sep 25)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size bmanning (Sep 26)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Patrick (Sep 26)
- RE: minimum IPv6 announcement size Azinger, Marla (Sep 26)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Darren Pilgrim (Sep 26)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size joel jaeggli (Sep 26)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Darren Pilgrim (Sep 26)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size William Herrin (Sep 26)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size joel jaeggli (Sep 26)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size bmanning (Sep 26)
- Message not available
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Ryan McIntosh (Sep 27)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Brandon Ross (Sep 27)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Joe Abley (Sep 27)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Randy Bush (Sep 24)