nanog mailing list archives
Re: VZ FIOS SoCo traceroute plea
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 13:50:55 -0400
vz does peer with routeviews... which at least tells you if 701 sees the routes in question, eh? On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Craig <cvuljanic () gmail com> wrote:
sorry for no DNS: traceroute to 96.44.148.54 from 10.10.10.1, 30 hops max, 36 byte packets 1 0.0 ms 0.0 ms 0.0 ms 71.245.189.1 2 0.0 ms 16.6 ms 16.6 ms 130.81.216.174 3 0.0 ms 0.0 ms 33.3 ms 130.81.209.76 4 16.6 ms 16.6 ms 33.3 ms 152.63.3.125 5 16.6 ms 16.6 ms 16.6 ms 129.250.8.37 6 33.3 ms 33.3 ms 16.6 ms 129.250.3.16 7 50.0 ms 50.0 ms 50.0 ms 129.250.3.51 8 50.0 ms 50.0 ms 50.0 ms 129.250.3.67 9 50.0 ms 66.6 ms 50.0 ms 69.31.63.168 10 50.0 ms 50.0 ms 50.0 ms 69.31.54.194 11 50.0 ms 50.0 ms 50.0 ms 96.44.148.54 Trace complete. On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 12:11 PM, Jim Popovitch <jimpop () gmail com> wrote:Hello, A desperate plea, since apparently VZ still doesn't have a public routeserver. :-( I need a trace from a VZ FIOS connection in Southern California, to 96.44.148.54 (Quadranet, DFW). Private replies are welcome and encouraged. Thank you, sorry for the noise. -Jim P.
Current thread:
- VZ FIOS SoCo traceroute plea Jim Popovitch (Oct 29)
- RE: VZ FIOS SoCo traceroute plea Kate Gerry (Oct 29)
- Re: VZ FIOS SoCo traceroute plea Craig (Oct 29)
- Re: VZ FIOS SoCo traceroute plea Christopher Morrow (Oct 29)
- RE: VZ FIOS SoCo traceroute plea Network IPdog (Oct 29)
- Re: VZ FIOS SoCo traceroute plea Christopher Morrow (Oct 29)