nanog mailing list archives
RE: minimum IPv6 announcement size
From: Leo Vegoda <leo.vegoda () icann org>
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 11:53:13 -0700
William Herrin wrote: [...]
And yet we're allocating /19's
If the stats published at http://www.nro.net/pub/stats/nro/delegated-extended are to be believed then the only two /19s were allocated in 2005 when the HD-ratio value in the policy was lower. Looking at all the RIRs together another nine /20s have been allocated and seven /21s. There are just 51 allocations of /22 of shorter prefixes. Given that almost 17,000 IPv6 blocks have been issued, those 51 blocks are really just a fraction of a percent and seem to represent the exception and not the norm. Leo
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Eric A Louie (Sep 30)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Larry Sheldon (Sep 30)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Ryan McIntosh (Oct 01)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size bmanning (Oct 01)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Owen DeLong (Oct 01)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Cutler James R (Oct 01)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Ryan McIntosh (Oct 01)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Rob Seastrom (Oct 01)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size William Herrin (Oct 01)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Owen DeLong (Oct 01)
- RE: minimum IPv6 announcement size Leo Vegoda (Oct 01)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size William Herrin (Oct 01)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Scott Weeks (Oct 01)