nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cogent 100M DIA in Denver
From: Jay Ashworth <jra () baylink com>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 19:01:20 -0400 (EDT)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Constantine A. Murenin" <mureninc () gmail com>
On 14 October 2013 12:57, Tri Tran <tritran () cox net> wrote:They're lit in the bulding and have a much faster installation interval. How reliable are they? Tri TranIt's worth pointing out that many IPv6 networks are unavailable from Cogent; so, effectively, in 2013, you still can't get IPv6 connectivity from Cogent.
And, presumably, IPv4 either, depending on whom they're having a peering war with that particular month. For a client connection, such is probably safe; I don't think I'd run servers on it. Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth Baylink jra () baylink com Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100 Ashworth & Associates http://baylink.pitas.com 2000 Land Rover DII St Petersburg FL USA #natog +1 727 647 1274
Current thread:
- Re: Cogent 100M DIA in Denver, (continued)
- Re: Cogent 100M DIA in Denver Brent Jones (Oct 14)
- Re: Cogent 100M DIA in Denver Robert Glover (Oct 14)
- RE: Cogent 100M DIA in Denver Eric C. Miller (Oct 24)
- Re: Cogent 100M DIA in Denver Constantine A. Murenin (Oct 14)
- Re: Cogent 100M DIA in Denver Wayne E Bouchard (Oct 14)
- Re: Cogent 100M DIA in Denver Blake Dunlap (Oct 14)
- Re: Cogent 100M DIA in Denver Constantine A. Murenin (Oct 14)
- Re: Cogent 100M DIA in Denver staticsafe (Oct 14)
- Re: Cogent 100M DIA in Denver Seth Mattinen (Oct 14)
- Re: Cogent 100M DIA in Denver Matthew Petach (Oct 18)
- Re: Cogent 100M DIA in Denver Wayne E Bouchard (Oct 14)