nanog mailing list archives
Re: AT&T UVERSE Native IPv6, a HOWTO
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 01:41:10 -0800
On Nov 28, 2013, at 1:07 PM, Leo Vegoda <leo.vegoda () icann org> wrote:
Andrew D Kirch wrote: Was I the only one who thought that everything about this was great apart from this comment:In reality additional poking leads me to believe AT&T gives you arathergenerous /60Is a /60 what is considered generous these days? I thought a /48 was considered normal and a /56 was considered a bit tight. What prefix lengths are residential access providers handing out by default these days? Regards, Leo
Agreed… Unforutnately, the big guys (Comcast, AT&T) in America seem to like victimizing their customers with undersized assignments, limiting choice of proper prefix sizes to only their business class customers. I’m not sure why they are doing this. I know when I’ve had conversations with them, they haven’t exactly given a reason so much as just said that they thought a /48 was ridiculous. Of course, if AT&T is blocking protocol 41, that’s even worse, because at least so long as that isn’t blocked, you can still get an HE tunnel and get a /48 if you need it anyway. Owen
Current thread:
- Re: AT&T UVERSE Native IPv6, a HOWTO, (continued)
- Re: AT&T UVERSE Native IPv6, a HOWTO Mark Andrews (Nov 28)
- Re: AT&T UVERSE Native IPv6, a HOWTO Constantine A. Murenin (Nov 28)
- Re: AT&T UVERSE Native IPv6, a HOWTO Mark Andrews (Nov 28)
- Re: AT&T UVERSE Native IPv6, a HOWTO Rob Seastrom (Nov 29)
- Re: AT&T UVERSE Native IPv6, a HOWTO Mikael Abrahamsson (Nov 28)
- Re: AT&T UVERSE Native IPv6, a HOWTO Mark Andrews (Nov 28)
- Re: AT&T UVERSE Native IPv6, a HOWTO Mikael Abrahamsson (Nov 28)
- Re: AT&T UVERSE Native IPv6, a HOWTO Jean-Francois . TremblayING (Nov 29)
- Re: AT&T UVERSE Native IPv6, a HOWTO Nick Cameo (Nov 29)
- Re: AT&T UVERSE Native IPv6, a HOWTO Rob Seastrom (Nov 29)