Re: NAT64 and matching identities

[Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>]

So one has to wonder how those names made it into the top 100 list if it’s supposed to be a top 100 web sites, since 
they are obviously not web sites.
(at least in the case of the two in the top 100)

Owen

On Nov 22, 2013, at 1:28 PM, Tony Hain <alh-ietf () tndh net> wrote:

> The only thing it explicitly strips out are dotted-quads, which don't occur
> until # 4255. The code makes five passes at getaddrinfo() for IPv4 before
> giving up, and then it checks for a leading www and if that exists it strips
> it off and does the 5 tries loop again, then later the same process for
> IPv6. For the top 100 run:
> akamaihd.net                    no IPv4   no IPv6
> bp.blogspot.com                 no IPv4   no IPv6
>
> FWIW :::
> Dotted-quad's in the top 10,000
> 4255,92.242.195.24
> 4665,1.1.1.1
> 5079,92.242.195.231
> 6130,1.254.254.254
> 9518,208.98.30.70
>
> > whois 92.242.195.24
> ...
> netname:        Respina
> descr:          BroadBand IP Pool
> country:        IR
> ...
> route:          92.242.195.0/24
>
> Respina BroadBand IP Pool in the top 100,000
> 4255,92.242.195.24
> 5079,92.242.195.231
> 10059,92.242.195.233
> 23912,92.242.195.30
> 31520,92.242.195.111
> 35867,92.242.195.235
> 95233,92.242.195.129
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Owen DeLong [mailto:owen () delong com]
> > Sent: Friday, November 22, 2013 12:16 PM
> > To: joel jaeggli
> > Cc: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu; Tony Hain; NANOG List
> > Subject: Re: NAT64 and matching identities
> >
> > It would be way more than 2 if it were CNAME, methinks.
> >
> > Owen
> >
> > On Nov 22, 2013, at 12:12 PM, joel jaeggli <joelja () bogus com> wrote:
> >
> > > On 11/22/13, 12:01 PM, Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 22 Nov 2013 10:18:27 -0800, "Tony Hain" said:
> > > >
> > > > > The top 100 websites: AAAA records and IPv6 connectivity
> > > > >          count with A:       98   ( 98.000%)
> > > > >       count with AAAA:       30   ( 30.000%)
> > > > > Of the 30 hosts with AAAA records, testing connectivity to TCP/80:
> > > > >    count with IPv6 ok:       30   (100.000%)
> > > >
> > > > Statistics whoopsie, or are there actually 2 sites in the top100 that
> > > > are IPv6-only?
> > >
> > > IN CNAME ? or is that being accounted for.