nanog mailing list archives
prefix filtering per IRR - practices
From: Frank Habicht <geier () geier ne tz>
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 14:55:54 +0300
Hi, I have a question regarding what's the most common practice [1] for transit ASs to filter prefixes from their BGP customers when using IRR data. (which of course everyone does...) Would many/most/all/none : a) accept only the prefixes listed in route objects or b) accept these and anything "upto /24" (or "le 24") I was hoping / assuming the latter but I start getting a different impression. Yep, and apart from the current status, the tendency would be of interest. Thanks, Frank [1] after "my network, my rules"
Current thread:
- prefix filtering per IRR - practices Frank Habicht (Nov 22)
- Re: prefix filtering per IRR - practices Chris Rogers (Nov 22)
- Re: prefix filtering per IRR - practices Michael Hallgren (Nov 22)
- Re: prefix filtering per IRR - practices Chris Rogers (Nov 22)