nanog mailing list archives

Re: Automatic abuse reports


From: Sam Moats <sam () circlenet us>
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 21:33:29 -0500

Don't have access to a normal PC right now but I agreed with this approach so much that I'm typing a response on a 10 button pad.
Sam

On 2013-11-13 21:33, Jimmy Hess wrote:
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 3:46 AM, Sam Moats <sam () circlenet us [1]>
wrote:

  

about its long term benefit to the entire network. I cant think of a
way to remove the incentive for this
short term thinking.

The end users can,  by inquiring  about the abuse desk, before
agreeing to sign up for service.

In this manner  "Not having a good abuse"  desk becomes a cost
center, in the form of suppressed opportunities for future revenue.

Federal entities, etc,  when soliciting for proposals from ISPs and
service providers....    in addition to the  "Must have IPv6
support",

could add a line  "Must have a highly-responsive abuse desk/abuse
contact;  with 4  professional references from email or network
operators in the industry who have worked with the abuse desk";

must  aggregate and report  matters of potential abuse or complaints
 regarding subscribers  outgoing mail or IP traffic within  3 hours
on average, during business hours.... and within  5 hours  24x7 ...
etc...

--
-JH 

Links:
------
[1] mailto:sam () circlenet us



Current thread: