nanog mailing list archives

Re: large scale ipsec


From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 14:11:54 -0400

On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Jan Schaumann <jschauma () netmeister org> wrote:
Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com> wrote:

One might look at MS's documentation about deploying end-to-end ipsec
in their enterprise for one example of peer-to-peer ubiquitous ipsec.

This is interesting and kind of what I'm looking for.  Do you have a
pointer to this documentation?

sadly I can't find what I once read :( damned webcrawler search!!!

My apologies for not having defined "large scale" in my original mail.
What I had in mind was, basically, environments ranging with multiple
datacenters (possibly across the globe) pushing tens of gb/s or more.

that's probably a different problem to solve, unless you wanted to
push the crypto down to the server/workstation level, which seems like
a more reasonable answer, for a number of reasons, provided you can do
key management and fault isolation.

One good reason to not do link encryption is: "the problem is that
whackadoodle box you put outside the router!" :( most often those
boxes can't do light-level monitoring, loopbacks, etc... all the stuff
your NOC wants to do when 'link flapped,doh!' happens.

-chris


Current thread: