nanog mailing list archives

Re: Tier 2 ingress filtering


From: Paul Ferguson <fergdawgster () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 12:42:30 -0700

On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Jay Ashworth <jra () baylink com> wrote:

----- Original Message -----
From: "William Herrin" <bill () herrin us>

So, you represent to your ISP that you're authorized to use a certain
range of addresses. He represents to his upstream that he's authorized
to use them on your behalf, and so on.

The former is a first-hand transaction: if you're lying to your edge
carrier, he can cut you off with no collateral damage.


Of course, he has to notice it first. :-)

ObOpinion: It's best to *enforce* a policy which disallows a
downstream network from sourcing spoofed packets -- and the closer to
the "edge" you are, the better, Hierarchy is great for that. :-)

I guess the next best thing is "Trust but verify"?

- ferg


-- 
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
 fergdawgster(at)gmail.com


Current thread: