nanog mailing list archives
Re: Tier 2 ingress filtering
From: Paul Ferguson <fergdawgster () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 12:42:30 -0700
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Jay Ashworth <jra () baylink com> wrote:
----- Original Message -----From: "William Herrin" <bill () herrin us>So, you represent to your ISP that you're authorized to use a certain range of addresses. He represents to his upstream that he's authorized to use them on your behalf, and so on.The former is a first-hand transaction: if you're lying to your edge carrier, he can cut you off with no collateral damage.
Of course, he has to notice it first. :-) ObOpinion: It's best to *enforce* a policy which disallows a downstream network from sourcing spoofed packets -- and the closer to the "edge" you are, the better, Hierarchy is great for that. :-) I guess the next best thing is "Trust but verify"? - ferg -- "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson fergdawgster(at)gmail.com
Current thread:
- Re: Tier 2 ingress filtering, (continued)
- Re: Tier 2 ingress filtering bmanning (Mar 28)
- Message not available
- Re: Tier 2 ingress filtering Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 28)
- Re: Tier 2 ingress filtering bmanning (Mar 28)
- Re: Tier 2 ingress filtering Jay Ashworth (Mar 28)
- Re: Tier 2 ingress filtering Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 28)
- Re: Tier 2 ingress filtering Jay Ashworth (Mar 28)
- Re: Tier 2 ingress filtering Jon Lewis (Mar 28)
- Re: Tier 2 ingress filtering goemon (Mar 28)
- Re: Tier 2 ingress filtering Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 28)
- Re: Tier 2 ingress filtering Jay Ashworth (Mar 28)
- Re: Tier 2 ingress filtering Paul Ferguson (Mar 28)
- Re: Tier 2 ingress filtering Jay Ashworth (Mar 28)
- Re: Tier 2 ingress filtering Jay Ashworth (Mar 28)
- Re: Tier 2 ingress filtering Saku Ytti (Mar 28)
- Re: Tier 2 ingress filtering Rajiv Asati (rajiva) (Mar 28)
- Re: Tier 2 ingress filtering Saku Ytti (Mar 28)
- Re: Tier 2 ingress filtering Jeff Kell (Mar 28)
- Re: Tier 2 ingress filtering William Herrin (Mar 29)
- Re: Tier 2 ingress filtering Patrick (Mar 29)