nanog mailing list archives
Re: So how big was it *really*?
From: Harry Hoffman <hhoffman () ip-solutions net>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 09:29:04 -0400
It's interesting, this just came up on gizmodo. As I said in another forum, take it for what it's worth: http://gizmodo.com/5992652/that-internet-war-apocalypse-is-a-lie Cheers, Harry On 03/28/2013 09:23 AM, Valdis Kletnieks wrote:
So we all have heard the breathless news reports of how the recent urinating contest between Spamhaus and a butthurt ISP was the "biggest in history". Where would you guys put it, if measured as "percent of total worldwide available Internet bandwidth/resources"? My gut feeling is that by that metric, it didn't even make the top 20. Think back to the Morris worm, or Blaster/Nachi/etc - *nobody* had any free bandwidth when those happened. And even if you restrict the discussion to intentional targeted attacks, I'm sure we've had worse (Smurf, anybody? :)
Current thread:
- So how big was it *really*? Valdis Kletnieks (Mar 28)
- Re: So how big was it *really*? Harry Hoffman (Mar 28)
- Re: So how big was it *really*? Simon Lockhart (Mar 28)
- Re: So how big was it *really*? Jay Ashworth (Mar 28)
- Re: So how big was it *really*? Matthew Petach (Mar 30)
- Re: So how big was it *really*? Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 30)
- Re: So how big was it *really*? Simon Lockhart (Mar 28)
- Re: So how big was it *really*? Harry Hoffman (Mar 28)
- Re: So how big was it *really*? Dobbins, Roland (Mar 28)
- Re: So how big was it *really*? Jared Mauch (Mar 28)
- Re: So how big was it *really*? Neil J. McRae (Mar 28)