nanog mailing list archives
Re: Network security on multiple levels (was Re: NYT covers China cyberthreat)
From: Mike A <mikea () mikea ath cx>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 17:01:55 -0500
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 04:41:42PM +0000, Warren Bailey wrote:
Not to mention, the KG units are dot government only.. For obvious reasons.
Erm ... yesandno. Lots of defense contractors have one end of a secured circuit. Been there, installed-and-maintained them. -- Mike Andrews, W5EGO mikea () mikea ath cx Tired old sysadmin
Current thread:
- Re: Network security on multiple levels (was Re: NYT covers China cyberthreat) Mike A (Mar 12)
- Re: Network security on multiple levels (was Re: NYT covers China cyberthreat) Warren Bailey (Mar 12)
- Re: Network security on multiple levels (was Re: NYT covers China cyberthreat) Shrdlu (Mar 12)
- RE: Network security on multiple levels (was Re: NYT covers China cyberthreat) Jamie Bowden (Mar 13)
- Re: Network security on multiple levels (was Re: NYT covers China cyberthreat) Shrdlu (Mar 12)
- RE: Network security on multiple levels (was Re: NYT covers China cyberthreat) Jamie Bowden (Mar 13)
- Re: Network security on multiple levels (was Re: NYT covers China cyberthreat) Warren Bailey (Mar 12)