nanog mailing list archives

Re: .nyc - here we go...


From: Mark Andrews <marka () isc org>
Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2013 09:55:01 +1000


In message <9FF40D24-169E-4568-9F25-EE00BEEED13A () matthew at>, Matthew Kaufman writes:
Well, for starters there's whole truckloads of surplus gear that you
can't  get for pennies and use successfully.

Surplus IPv6 capable gear has been around for a long while now.
Remember most gear has had IPv6 for over a decade now.  A lot of
gear that ISC got given for IPv6 development was on it 2nd or 3rd
repurposing before we got it nearly a decade ago.

Matthew Kaufman

(Sent from my iPhone)

On Jul 4, 2013, at 11:11 AM, Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:

On Thu, 04 Jul 2013 10:34:41 -0700, Eric Brunner-Williams said:

#insert usual junk from *nog v6 evangelicals that .africa and .eos
(Basque Autonomous Region) must drive v6 adoption from their
ever-so-deep-pockets, or the net will die.

I'll bite.  What's the *actual* additional cost for dnssec and ipv6
support for a greenfield rollout?  It's greenfield, so there's no
"our older gear/software/admins need upgrading" issues.


-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka () isc org


Current thread: