nanog mailing list archives

Re: which firewall product?


From: William Herrin <bill () herrin us>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 18:39:38 -0400

On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 5:36 PM, Blake Dunlap <ikiris () gmail com> wrote:
Well, I guess my first question is: Is this a design you are stuck with for
some reason or alternately, is there a good reason for it, and I need to be
educated as to real world design? It seems rather odd to put a firewall
boundry between a LB and its associated cluster as opposed to in front of
the LB.

Howdy,

Paperwork. The customer owns 3 servers in a system of a consisting of
a hundred or so. He wants his security people to accredit it. They
won't accredit individual servers, so his options were: duplicate the
full system just for him (very expensive) or create a security
boundary where he can say, "This is my enclave. Accredit my enclave."

Naturally his security people decide that they don't want the
firewalls to be additional servers running Linux. That would make it
far too easy to secure his system. I don't yet know if they'd accept
an appliance running Linux underneath. :/

-Bill


-- 
William D. Herrin ................ herrin () dirtside com  bill () herrin us
3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004


Current thread: